In a shocking turn of events, Serbian police reportedly utilized a military-grade sound cannon against anti-government protesters in Belgrade. This incident occurred while demonstrators were observing a 15-minute moment of silence, raising serious concerns about the use of excessive force in response to peaceful protests.

Key Takeaways

  • Serbian police used an LRAD sonic cannon against protesters.
  • The incident took place during a moment of silence for victims of government policies.
  • The use of such devices raises questions about police conduct and human rights.

Background of the Protests

The protests in Serbia have been ongoing for several months, fueled by public discontent over government policies, corruption, and media censorship. Demonstrators have gathered in large numbers, calling for accountability and reform. The moment of silence was organized to honor those affected by the government’s actions, highlighting the emotional weight of the protests.

What Is an LRAD Sonic Cannon?

The Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) is a type of sonic cannon designed to emit a focused beam of sound. It is often used for crowd control and can produce sounds at levels that are painful to the human ear. Here are some key features of the LRAD:

  • Targeted Sound: Emits sound in a narrow beam, allowing for precise targeting.
  • High Decibel Levels: Can reach sound levels of up to 160 decibels, which can cause hearing damage.
  • Non-Lethal: Marketed as a non-lethal crowd control tool, though its use raises ethical concerns.

The Incident

During the moment of silence, police reportedly activated the LRAD, directing the sound at the gathered protesters. Eyewitness accounts describe a chaotic scene as the sound pierced through the silence, causing panic among demonstrators. Many were left disoriented and in pain, leading to a swift condemnation from human rights organizations.

See also  Deportation Crisis: Thousands of Balkan Nationals at Risk in the U.S.

Reactions to the Police Action

The deployment of the sonic cannon has sparked outrage both domestically and internationally. Here are some notable reactions:

  • Human Rights Groups: Organizations have condemned the use of such devices against peaceful protesters, calling it a violation of human rights.
  • Political Leaders: Opposition leaders have criticized the government for its heavy-handed approach, demanding accountability for the police’s actions.
  • Public Sentiment: Many citizens expressed their anger on social media, calling for an end to police brutality and greater respect for civil liberties.

Conclusion

The use of a sonic cannon against protesters in Belgrade marks a troubling escalation in the government’s response to dissent. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how authorities will address the backlash and whether there will be any accountability for the actions taken against peaceful demonstrators. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle for human rights and freedom of expression in Serbia.