New evidence suggests Serbian authorities are employing sound cannons against protesters. Recent images from a March 15 demonstration reveal a gendarmerie vehicle equipped with an LRAD-like system, raising concerns about the methods used to manage public dissent and the potential for harm from such devices.
Escalating Concerns Over Protest Control
Concerns are mounting regarding the tactics employed by Serbian authorities in managing public demonstrations. The emergence of photographic evidence depicting a gendarmerie vehicle outfitted with what appears to be a Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) system during a protest on March 15 has intensified scrutiny. This development follows previous allegations of the illegal use of sound cannons against protesters, suggesting a pattern of escalating force.
Key Takeaways
- New images from a March 15 protest show a gendarmerie vehicle equipped with an LRAD-like system.
- This evidence supports earlier claims of Serbian authorities illegally using sound cannons on protesters.
- The use of such devices raises significant human rights concerns regarding freedom of assembly and potential for injury.
The Implications of LRAD Technology
LRAD systems are designed to project highly focused, high-decibel sound waves over long distances. While proponents argue their utility for crowd dispersal and communication, critics highlight the potential for misuse and harm. Exposure to high-intensity sound can lead to:
- Temporary or permanent hearing damage.
- Pain and disorientation.
- Nausea and vertigo.
Human rights organizations have consistently voiced concerns over the deployment of such devices in protest settings, advocating for their restricted use due to the inherent risks to public health and safety. The alleged deployment by Serbian authorities warrants a thorough investigation to ascertain the legality and proportionality of its use.
Calls for Transparency and Accountability
In light of this new evidence, there are growing calls for greater transparency from Serbian authorities regarding their crowd control methods. Activists and international observers are urging a full disclosure of the types of equipment being used and the protocols governing their deployment. Accountability for any illegal or excessive use of force remains a critical demand, emphasizing the need for adherence to international human rights standards in managing public assemblies.
