Croatia: PM Plenković defends Finance Minister Marić

Croatia: PM Plenković defends Finance Minister Marić

Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković on Wednesday evening defended Finance Minister Zdravko Marić from yet another attempt by the parliamentary Opposition to have the minister replaced, calling the opposition motion bizarre and the group of MPs who supported it as ridiculous, media in Croatia reported.

“The parliamentary majority rejects the motion and Minister Marić will continue doing his job to the benefit of the Croatian economy,” Plenković said in a debate on a motion by 34 opposition MPs for the parliament to give Marić a vote of no confidence.

He then described independent MP Karolina Vidović Krišto’s presentation in which she explained the reasons for the motion as ‘bizarre’, likening the ideologically diverse group of MPs who supported it to “a circus troupe”.

The PM said that the Opposition did not understand the concept of division of powers, judicial autonomy or unobstructed police work, dismissing their claims as conspiracy theories.

Speaking of the government’s achievements, Plenković recalled the tax reform, reduction of public debt, restoration of the country’s credit rating, and job preservation, wondering what Vidović Krišto had done. “What have you done for Croatia to join the EU? Nothing at all,” he said.

He added that the incumbent government would continue in its present form for several years to come and work to improve citizens’ living standards.

Finance Minister Zdravko Marić dismissed allegations from the motion for a vote of no confidence, calling them unfounded.

He said that he categorically rejected any insinuation, starting with the one that he used his position to favour his friends’ and acquaintances’ interests, noting that he was doing his job conscientiously and responsibly.

Vidović Krišto launched the motion for a vote of no confidence in Marić over his spending a few days on a yacht owned by businessman Blaž Pavičić and over what she described as “his lie to the public that the businessman does not do business with the state.”